Search Algorithms: Differences Between Sequential Search and Binary Search, and Which Is Faster?
The article introduces two basic search algorithms: sequential search and binary search, which are used to locate specific elements in data. Sequential search (linear search) works by comparing elements one by one. It does not require the data to be ordered, with a time complexity of O(n) (where n is the amount of data). Its advantage is simplicity, but its drawback is low efficiency, making it suitable for small data volumes or unordered data. Binary search (half-interval search) requires the data to be sorted. It narrows down the search range by half through comparison, with a time complexity of O(log n). It is highly efficient (e.g., only about 10 comparisons needed when n=1000), but it requires handling boundary conditions, and is suitable for large-sized ordered data. Comparison of the two: Sequential search does not require data ordering and is simple to implement but inefficient; binary search requires ordering and has higher complexity but is faster. The choice depends on data size and ordering: binary search for large ordered data and sequential search for small unordered data.
Read MoreBinary Search: How Much Faster Than Linear Search? Search Techniques in Data Structures
This article introduces search algorithms in computers, focusing on linear search and binary search. Linear search (sequential search) is a basic method that checks data one by one from the beginning to the end. It has a time complexity of O(n) and is suitable for scenarios with small data volumes or unordered data. In the worst case, it needs to traverse all data. Binary search, on the other hand, requires an ordered array. Its core is to eliminate half of the data each time, with a time complexity of O(log n). When the data volume is large, it is far more efficient than linear search (e.g., for n=1 million, binary search only needs 20 times, while linear search needs 1 million times). The two have different applicable scenarios: binary search is suitable for ordered, large - data - volume, and frequently searched scenarios; linear search is suitable for unordered, small - data - volume, or dynamically changing data. In summary, binary search significantly improves efficiency through "half - by - half elimination" and is an efficient choice for large - volume ordered data. Linear search is more flexible in scenarios with small data volumes or unordered data.
Read MoreHow Does a Hash Table Store Data? Hash Functions Simplify Lookup
The article uses the analogy of searching for a book to introduce the problem: sequential search of data (such as arrays) is inefficient, while a hash table is an efficient storage tool. The core of a hash table is the hash function, which maps data to "buckets" (array positions) to enable fast access and storage. The hash function converts data into a hash value (bucket number), for example, taking the last two digits of a student ID to get the hash value. When storing, the hash value is first calculated to locate the bucket. If multiple data items have the same hash value (collision), it can be resolved using the linked list method (chaining within the bucket) or open addressing (finding the next empty bucket). When searching, the hash value is directly calculated to locate the bucket, and then the search is performed within the bucket, eliminating the need to traverse all data, resulting in extremely fast speed. Hash tables are widely used (such as in address books and caches), with their core being the use of a hash function to transform the search from "scanning through everything" to "direct access".
Read More